The premise of this project and the material qualities it could lead you to research are fascinating – I would very much encourage you to continue with this line of enquiry. The specificity of your location and brief are a strength at this point in time.
Do bear in mind that the poster can work better as a “unity” (imagine as if this is for a competition submission) – rather than a series of tiles in a large piece of paper (which is more or less your current format). This means that you have to be VERY SELECTIVE about the work that goes on the poster, but doesn’t mean that you cannot research the area and geography in depth. The materials that don’t “make it” into the poster can be kept in a folder on your computer.
Some additional datasets that you could consider finding (and illustrating in your posters) are night-time vs day-time temperatures – outdoors and inside a massive stone construction. The research into Baranovich system is interesting – since when is this implemented in this way? Are there examples of stone construction that you can identify, prior to this system existing? Is there a relationship between stone and planning policy (as a way of preserving a certain “look”)? Is this zoned (for example, in some neighbourhoods but not in others? based on … longevity? conservation status?) Lastly, within the “ecological corridor” can you identify a more zoomed in site? Can you analyse what is immediately around the site? Remember – laser focus!
As you know, some students will come to present their work, so that you can get a better idea on how to work and improve your course output. Until March, we won’t be having 1-1 tutorials, so this feedback is very important to take onboard until then. If you have further questions about this feedback, please do not hesitate to get back in touch. P
The premise of this project and the material qualities it could lead you to research are fascinating – I would very much encourage you to continue with this line of enquiry. The specificity of your location and brief are a strength at this point in time.
Do bear in mind that the poster can work better as a “unity” (imagine as if this is for a competition submission) – rather than a series of tiles in a large piece of paper (which is more or less your current format). This means that you have to be VERY SELECTIVE about the work that goes on the poster, but doesn’t mean that you cannot research the area and geography in depth. The materials that don’t “make it” into the poster can be kept in a folder on your computer.
Some additional datasets that you could consider finding (and illustrating in your posters) are night-time vs day-time temperatures – outdoors and inside a massive stone construction. The research into Baranovich system is interesting – since when is this implemented in this way? Are there examples of stone construction that you can identify, prior to this system existing? Is there a relationship between stone and planning policy (as a way of preserving a certain “look”)? Is this zoned (for example, in some neighbourhoods but not in others? based on … longevity? conservation status?) Lastly, within the “ecological corridor” can you identify a more zoomed in site? Can you analyse what is immediately around the site? Remember – laser focus!
As you know, some students will come to present their work, so that you can get a better idea on how to work and improve your course output. Until March, we won’t be having 1-1 tutorials, so this feedback is very important to take onboard until then. If you have further questions about this feedback, please do not hesitate to get back in touch. P